Confronting Property Rights and Wrongs

In the modern age of blogs, social networking, online reviews and article directories, it is not uncommon to see an English newspaper published with a morning news feature or an English language news headline without any indication of the source, let alone any links to the original article. Often there is no byline at all. Is this plagiarism? Can you sue for copyright infringement? check this link right here now to know more information

An Unfair Advantage: Confronting Organized Intellectual Property Theft

As with plagiarism, if there is a byline and the words “copyrighted,” then you have a legitimate case. The problem is that some people are tempted to post news headlines as content for blog or website pages. It is also perfectly acceptable to add an attribution to the original work, or use the phrase “created by”? While it may be acceptable to post a free-linking URL to an article, you should never attribute the entire work to the same person. Remember, “created by” and “owned by” have nothing to do with Fair Use. This morning report was not “created by?”

Of course, it might be somewhat difficult to know who is responsible for such a blatantly plagiarized content. Usually there will be a byline, which gives some clue as to who is responsible, but the exact words, format, and sources are hard to determine. For example, the article in this morning’s AEC News Today was completely plagiarized from an article that appeared in an English language review in the same publication the day before. The article uses exactly the same format and wording. However, it is nearly impossible to tell from the byline whether or not the article was actually written by somebody other than the author.

This is not the only situation with plagiarism in the English language. For example, during the last election campaign, some emails were circulating saying that Senator Obama was born in Kenya. This turned out to be untrue, but rather a clever attempt to sway the voting public. One could say the candidates were lying about where they were born in order to gain political power. The day after this news hit, The Washington Post issued a retraction and removed the story from its web site.

It is not only newspapers and magazines that use copyrighted material without permission. In today’s Internet age almost every web site, e-book, blog, and every piece of electronic information can be copyrighted. This includes almost every sentence in a book or magazine article. Copying someone’s work without their permission is theft. It may be a bit harder to sue somebody if they’ve taken your ideas and put them on the Internet, but you can certainly sue if you end up being the victim of Internet thieves.

One of the biggest problems with owning property is renting out properties that are located on someone else’s land. There are so many renters out there who have no idea that they are indeed committing illegalities just by renting their home. You may own a piece of property and someone has been stealing your hard-earned cash without you knowing it. Not only do you have the right to reclaim your property, but also the right to hold the person responsible for the damages.

Owning a house is something that most people dream about and rarely ever accomplish. If you are one of those people who think owning a house is like owning an island paradise, then you should probably take a few classes like Constitutional Law and Equity. You’d probably be surprised at just what laws are in place for owning a real estate property. Some things that are in place that are against common sense, but are actually against the law.

Confronting Property Rights and Wrongs takes on a new meaning when you realize that owning property is more complicated than just buying it. There are many little laws that are in place that make owning a piece of property a little more complex. I have seen a few situations where a landlord has been sued because they didn’t want to give a tenant something that the tenant did not have permission to stay in their house. In these situations, it is always the owner’s burden to prove that they were unaware that the tenant did not have permission to be in the house. It is always better to be safe than sorry when it comes to owning property.